Comparison of Healing Time in Closed Fractures of the Tibial Diaphysis and Tibial-Fibula after ORIF Plate and Screw at Waled Regional Public Hospital, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35898/ghmj-821200Keywords:
Healing Time, Closed Fractures, Tibia Diaphysis, Tibia-Fibula, Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF)Abstract
Background: Fractures are projected to become the fourth leading cause of death by 2030. A fracture is a discontinuity in the bone that is often accompanied by damage to the surrounding tissues. The healing process of fractures is influenced by various factors, the greater the damage to the bone and surrounding tissues, the longer the healing time. In cases of tibia and fibula fractures, the most commonly used surgical procedure in Indonesia is Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) using Plates and Screw.
Aims: To compare of healing time in closed fractures of the tibial diaphysis and tibial-fibula after ORIF Plate and Screw at Waled regional public hospital.
Methods: This research uses a cross sectional design. A total of 77 samples were obtained using total sampling. Statistical tests use Mann Whitney.
Results: There were 37 patients with closed fractures of the tibia diaphysis and 40 patients with closed fractures of the tibia-fibula diaphysis. The healing time for closed tibial diaphyseal fractures was ≤ 24 weeks in 12 patients (32.4%), while > 24 weeks was 25 patients (67.6%). In patients with closed fractures of the tibia-fibula diaphysis within ≤ 24 weeks and > 24 weeks, the number was the same, namely 20 patients (50.0%). In the Mann-Whitney test, a significance value of 0.032 (p<0.05) was obtained, indicating a significant difference in the healing time between closed fractures of the tibial diaphysis and tibia-fibula after ORIF Plate and Screw at Waled Regional Hospital, with an average healing of 44.69 weeks for closed fractures of the tibial diaphysis, whereas for fractures closed tibia-fibula diaphysis 33.74 weeks.
Conclusion: The average healing time for closed tibial diaphyseal fractures is longer than for tibia-fibula.
Downloads
References
Saied, A., Ostovar, M., Mousavi, A. A., & Arabnejhad, F. (2016). Comparison of intramedullary nail and plating in treatment of diaphyseal tibial fractures with intact fibulae: A randomized controlled trial. Indian journal of orthopaedics, 50, 277-282. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.181793
Jhonet, A., Armin, M. F., Mandala, Z., Sudiadnyani, N. P., & Sari, H. M. (2022). Angka Kejadian Fraktur Tibia Berdasarkan Usia, Jenis Kelamin Dan Klasifikasi Fraktur Berdasarkan Mekanisme Trauma Di Rsud. H. Abdul Moeloek Bandar Lampung. Jurnal Ilmu Kedokteran dan Kesehatan, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.33024/jikk.v9i1.6283
Rajan, A. D., Borgohain, M., Sonowal, K., Abraham, D., Sharma, M., & Deb, M. (2023). Role of fibula in healing of closed diaphyseal tibial fractures treated with intramedullary interlocking nail. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Surgery, 8(3), 183-189. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijos.2022.032
Wibisono, B., Pebryan, M. R., & Sutara, S. (2023). KARAKTERISTIK LUKA PADA KORBAN KECELAKAAN LALU LINTAS BERDASARKAN REKAM MEDIS DI RSUD WALED TAHUN 2021-2022. PREPOTIF: JURNAL KESEHATAN MASYARAKAT, 7(3), 16440-16447. https://doi.org/10.31004/prepotif.v7i3.20434
Permatasari, C., & Sari, I. Y. (2022). Terapi Relaksasi Benson Untuk Menurunkan Rasa Nyeri Pada Pasien Fraktur Femur Sinistra: Studi Kasus. JKM: Jurnal Keperawatan Merdeka, 2(2), 216-220. https://doi.org/10.36086/jkm.v2i2.1420
Ewari, G. A. P., & Premana, Y. (2021). Karakteristik pasien fraktur kruris di RSUD Sanjiwani Gianyar tahun 2020. Intisari Sains Medis, 12(3), 689-693. https://doi.org/10.15562/ism.v12i3.1141
Mahartha, G. R. A., Maliawan, S., & Kawiyana, K. S. (2017). Manajemen Fraktur Pada Trauma Muskuloskeletal. E-Jurnal Medika Udayana, 2 (3), 548–560. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eum/article/view/4939
Lianturi, G. M., Yonathan, C., & Winata, H. (2021). Gambaran Union pada Fraktur dengan Menggunakan Plate and Screw Setelah 2 Bulan di Ciputra Hospital Citra Raya Periode Januari 2018–Desember 2019. Jurnal Kedokteran Meditek, 27(2), 109-113.https://doi.org/10.36452/jkdoktmeditek.v27i2.2013
Houben, I. B., Raaben, M., Van Basten Batenburg, M., & Blokhuis, T. J. (2018). Delay in weight bearing in surgically treated tibial shaft fractures is associated with impaired healing: a cohort analysis of 166 tibial fractures. European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology, 28, 1429-1436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-018-2190-2
Leow, J. M., Clement, N. D., & Simpson, A. H. W. (2020). Application of the Radiographic Union Scale for Tibial fractures (RUST): assessment of healing rate and time of tibial fractures managed with intramedullary nailing. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 106(1), 89-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.10.010
Massari, L., Benazzo, F., Falez, F., Cadossi, R., Perugia, D., Pietrogrande, L., & Setti, S. (2018). Can clinical and surgical parameters be combined to predict how long it will take a tibia fracture to heal? A prospective multicentre observational study: the FRACTING study. BioMed Research International, 2018(1), 1809091. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1809091
Solomon, L., Warwick, D., & Nayagam, S. (2005). Apley's concise system of orthopaedics and fractures. Crc Press.
Madhukar, K. T., & Basha, K. M. (2017). To compare outcomes in patients with diaphyseal fracture of tibia managed by intramedullary nailing with intact fibula vs fracture tibia with fibula. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Surgery, 3(4), 382-385. https://doi.org/10.18231/2395-1362.2017.0074
Maynard, R. L., & Downes, N. (2019). Anatomy and histology of the laboratory rat in toxicology and biomedical research. Academic Press.
Donsu, M. B., Lengkong, A. C., & Rawung, R. B. (2021). Gambaran Penyembuhan Tulang Sekunder pada Fraktur dengan Anatomical Reduction Fixation Tipe Plate and Screw di RSUP Prof. Dr. RD Kandou Periode 2019 –2020. e-CliniC, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.35790/ecl.v9i1.32120
Rustam, M,. Indriyani, N. (2019). Perbandingan Tingkat Penyembuhan Tulang Antara Isolated Tibial Diaphyseal Fracture, Both Tibial dan Fibula Diaphyseal Fracture Setelah Terapi Interlocking Intramedullary Solid Nail. http://dx.doi.org/10.46496/medula.v6i1.5373
Susanti, N., & Damayanti, R. T. (2023). Penatalaksanaan Fisioterapi Pada Post Op Oriffraktur 13 Radius Distal Sinistra Denganmodalitas Infra Red (Ir) Dan Terapi Latihan. Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi Muhammadiyah, 3, 18-27. https://doi.org/10.30651/jar.v3i1.17544
Kemenkes, R. I. (2019). Pedoman nasional pelayanan kedokteran penatalaksanaan fraktur. Jakarta: Kemenkes RI. https://kemkes.go.id/id/pnpk-2019---tata-laksana-penatalaksanaan-fraktur
Riskesdas. (2018). Laporan Riskesdas Provinsi Jawa Barat. [Internet]. Lembaga Penerbit Badan Litbang Kesehatan. 1640. https://repository.badankebijakan.kemkes.go.id/id/eprint/3857/1/LAPORAN%20RISKESDAS%20JAWA%20BARAT%202018.pdf
Samsir., Sulasri., & Arnoli, A. (2023). Correlation between Age, Type of Fracture and Location of Long Bone Fracture on Length of Hospitalization of Post Op Patients. Formosa Journal of Science and Technology. 2(7), 1759–1770. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjst.v2i7.4684
Setyoko, S. A., & Tata, H. (2021). Case Report: Open Reduction Internal Fixation (Orif) And Debridement As Treatment To Case On Tibia Fibula Fracture. Jurnal Medical Profession (MedPro), 3(3). https://jurnal.fk.untad.ac.id/index.php/medpro/article/view/719/404
Sjamsuhidajat, R., & De Jong, W. (2017). Buku ajar ilmu bedah, sistem organ dan tindak bedahnya. Edisi ke-4. Jakarta: EGC.
Snell, R. S. (2012). Anatomi klinis berdasarkan sistem. Dialih bahasakan oleh Sugarto L. Jakarta: EGC, 17.
Wahyuni, T. D. (2021). Asuhan keperawatan gangguan sistem muskuloskeletal. Penerbit NEM. https://perpustakaan.poltekkesmalang.ac.id/assets/file/karyadosen/EBOOK_ASUHAN_KEPERAWATAN_GANGGUAN_SISTEM_MUSKULOSKELETAL.pdf
Ridwan, U. N. (2019). Karakteristik Kasus Fraktur Ekstremitas Bawah Di Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Dr H Chasan Boesoirie Ternate Tahun 2018. Kieraha Medical Journal, 1(1).https://doi.org/10.33387/kmj.v1i1.1662
Noor, Z. (2016). Buku ajar gangguan muskuloskeletal. Jakarta: Salemba Medika.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dede Nurlaela Sakinah S.Ked., dr. Widiyatmiko Arifin Putro, Sp.OT., dr. Merliana Debyanti, Sp.Rad.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
GHMJ (Global Health Management Journal) conforms fully to The Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) and DOAJ Open Access Definition. Authors, readers, and reviewers are free to Share ” copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and Adapt ” remix, transform, and build upon the material. Author(s) retain unrestricted copyrights and publishing rights of their work. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Learn the details at the License policy.
How to Cite
