PERCEPTION OF MEDICAL DOCTORS ON CHEST TUBE THORACOSTOMY SIMULATION MODEL
Keywords:
Chest tube thoracostomy, simulation model, procedural skills trainingAbstract
Background: Chest tube thoracostomy is a common procedure that offers in patients with medical emergency conditions. Severe complications or even death can occur to the patients if medical doctors do not well perform and skillfully. This study aims to find medical doctors' perception of the realistic features of the chest tube thoracostomy simulation model, which was developed by researchers.
Methods: Fifteen Myanmar medical doctors were voluntarily to enroll in a half-day, chest tube thoracostomy workshop. Data of medical doctors' perception was collected using a 5-points Likert's scale self-evaluation survey form. In addition, the participants were asked to write their comments or suggestions for the realistic features of the chest tube thoracostomy simulation model.
Results: Medical doctors' perception on the realistic features of the chest tube thoracostomy simulation model was positive by responding as agree and strongly agree. All experts perceived as strongly agree in cost effectiveness of the model (100%) and using the model in the procedural training (100%). The postgraduate doctors responded to similar human sensations and complying procedural steps as agree (92.3%) in both statements. All experts rated to self-confidence (100%) as agree whereas the
postgraduate doctors responded to it as agree (84.6%). Participants preferred the structures of the simulation model and its educational values for the chest tube thoracostomy procedural skills training. They suggested to use this simulation model for training medical students.
Conclusion: The perception of the medical doctors on the realistic features of the chest tube thoracostomy simulation model showed that this simulation model could use as an effective educational tool in the procedural skills training.
Downloads
References
Gaba DM. The future vision of simulation in health care. Qual Saf Heal Care. 2004;13(Suppl 1):i2–10.
Okuda Y, Bryson EO, DeMaria S, Jacobson L, Quinones J, Shen B, et al. The utility of simulation in medical education: What is the
evidence? Mt Sinai J Med. 2009;76(4):330–43.
Weller JM, Nestel D, Marshall SD, Brooks PM, Conn JJ. Simulation in clinical teaching and learning. Med J Aust. 2012;196(9):594.
Ahn J, Menon S. Procedural Simulation. Diease-a-month. 2007;57(11):691–9.
Kuhajda I, Zarogoulidis K, Kougioumtzi I, Huang H, Li Q, Dryllis G, et al. Tube thoracostomy; chest tube implantation and follow up.
J Thorac Dis. 2014;6(Suppl 4):S470-9.
Fitzpatrick C, Brasel KJ. Chest tube insertion. Oper Tech Gen Surg. 2003;5(3):129–33.
Senanayake E, Smith G, Rooney S, Graham T, Greaves I. Chest drains: An overview. Trauma. 2017;19:86–93.
Harris A, O'Driscoll BR, Turkington PM. Survey of major complications of intercostal chest drain insertion in the UK. Postgrad Med J. 2010;86:68–72.
Laws D, Neville E, Duffy J. BTS guidelines for the insertion of a chest drain. Thorax. 2003;58(Suppl II):ii53-i59.
Pearce AP. Chest drain insertion: Improving techniques and decreasing complications. Emerg Med Australas. 2009;21:91–3.
Lammers RL, Davenport M, Korley F, Griswold-Theodorson S, Fitch MT, Narang AT, et al. Teaching and assessing procedural skills
using simulation: Metrics and methodology. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(11):1079–87.
Norris TE, Cullison SW, Fihn SD. Teaching procedural skills. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;12(s2):64–70.
Hutton IA, Kenealy H, Wong C. Using simulation models to teach junior doctors how to insert chest tubes: A brief and effective teaching module. Intern Med J. 2008;38:887–91.
Peterson RA. A Meta-Analysis of Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha. J Consum Res. 1994;21(2):381.
Bellemare JF, Cordeau MP, Leblanc P, Bellemare F. Thoracic dimensions at maximum lung inflation in normal subjects and in patients with obstructive and restrictive lung diseases. Chest. 2001;119(2):376–86.
Gupta AO, Ramasethu J. An innovative nonanimal simulation trainer for chest tube insertion in neonates. Pediatrics. 2014;134:1–8.
Naicker T, Hughes E, McLeod D. Validation of a novel resin-porcine thorax model for chest drain insertion training. Clin Med (Northfield Il). 2012;12(1):49–52.
Bruno CJ, Glass KM. Cost-effective and low-technology options for simulation and training in neonatology. Semin Perinatol. 2016;40(7):473–9.
Ghazali A, Breque C, Leger A, Scepi M, Oriot D. Testing of a complete training model for chest tube insertion in traumatic
pneumothorax. J Soc Simul Healthc. 2015;10:239–44.
Berkenstadt H, Munz Y, Trodler G, Blumenfeld A, Rubin O, Ziv A. Evaluation of the Trauma-Man® simulator for training in chest
drain insertion. Eur J Trauma. 2006;32:523–6.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Each author(s) agree to transfer all copyrights and assign YAYASAN ALIANSI CENDEKIAWAN INDONESIA THAILAND, the Publisher of Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Science and Health, for the full term of exclusive copyright and any extensions or renewals of that terms thereof throughout the world, including but not limited to publish, disseminate, transmit, store, translate, distribute, sell, republish and use the Contribution and material contained therein in print and electronic form of the journal and in other derivative works, in all languages and any form of media of expression available now or in the future and to license or permit others to do so.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Science and Health is an open access following Creative Commons License Deed – Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Users are allowed to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material with one condition--appropriate credit is given to the journal.
