• Phone Myint Hlaing Institute for Innovative Learning, Mahidol University, Thailand
  • Thasaneeya Ratanaroutai Nopparatjamjomras Institute for Innovative Learning, Mahidol University, Thailand
  • Suchai Nopparatjamjomras Institute for Innovative Learning, Mahidol University, Thailand


Chest tube thoracostomy, simulation model, procedural skills training


Background: Chest tube thoracostomy is a common procedure that offers in patients with medical emergency conditions. Severe complications or even death can occur to the patients if medical doctors do not well perform and skillfully. This study aims to find medical doctors’ perception of the realistic features of the chest tube thoracostomy simulation model, which was developed by researchers.

Methods: Fifteen Myanmar medical doctors were voluntarily to enroll in a half-day, chest tube thoracostomy workshop. Data of medical doctors’ perception was collected using a 5-points Likert’s scale self-evaluation survey form. In addition, the participants were asked to write their comments or suggestions for the realistic features of the chest tube thoracostomy simulation model.

Results: Medical doctors’ perception on the realistic features of the chest tube thoracostomy simulation model was positive by responding as agree and strongly agree. All experts perceived as strongly agree in cost effectiveness of the model (100%) and using the model in the procedural training (100%). The postgraduate doctors responded to similar human sensations and complying procedural steps as agree (92.3%) in both statements. All experts rated to self-confidence (100%) as agree whereas the
postgraduate doctors responded to it as agree (84.6%). Participants preferred the structures of the simulation model and its educational values for the chest tube thoracostomy procedural skills training. They suggested to use this simulation model for training medical students.

Conclusion: The perception of the medical doctors on the realistic features of the chest tube thoracostomy simulation model showed that this simulation model could use as an effective educational tool in the procedural skills training.


Gaba DM. The future vision of simulation in health care. Qual Saf Heal Care. 2004;13(Suppl 1):i2–10.

Okuda Y, Bryson EO, DeMaria S, Jacobson L, Quinones J, Shen B, et al. The utility of simulation in medical education: What is the

evidence? Mt Sinai J Med. 2009;76(4):330–43.

Weller JM, Nestel D, Marshall SD, Brooks PM, Conn JJ. Simulation in clinical teaching and learning. Med J Aust. 2012;196(9):594.

Ahn J, Menon S. Procedural Simulation. Diease-a-month. 2007;57(11):691–9.

Kuhajda I, Zarogoulidis K, Kougioumtzi I, Huang H, Li Q, Dryllis G, et al. Tube thoracostomy; chest tube implantation and follow up.

J Thorac Dis. 2014;6(Suppl 4):S470-9.

Fitzpatrick C, Brasel KJ. Chest tube insertion. Oper Tech Gen Surg. 2003;5(3):129–33.

Senanayake E, Smith G, Rooney S, Graham T, Greaves I. Chest drains: An overview. Trauma. 2017;19:86–93.

Harris A, O’Driscoll BR, Turkington PM. Survey of major complications of intercostal chest drain insertion in the UK. Postgrad Med J. 2010;86:68–72.

Laws D, Neville E, Duffy J. BTS guidelines for the insertion of a chest drain. Thorax. 2003;58(Suppl II):ii53-i59.

Pearce AP. Chest drain insertion: Improving techniques and decreasing complications. Emerg Med Australas. 2009;21:91–3.

Lammers RL, Davenport M, Korley F, Griswold-Theodorson S, Fitch MT, Narang AT, et al. Teaching and assessing procedural skills

using simulation: Metrics and methodology. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(11):1079–87.

Norris TE, Cullison SW, Fihn SD. Teaching procedural skills. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;12(s2):64–70.

Hutton IA, Kenealy H, Wong C. Using simulation models to teach junior doctors how to insert chest tubes: A brief and effective teaching module. Intern Med J. 2008;38:887–91.

Peterson RA. A Meta-Analysis of Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha. J Consum Res. 1994;21(2):381.

Bellemare JF, Cordeau MP, Leblanc P, Bellemare F. Thoracic dimensions at maximum lung inflation in normal subjects and in patients with obstructive and restrictive lung diseases. Chest. 2001;119(2):376–86.

Gupta AO, Ramasethu J. An innovative nonanimal simulation trainer for chest tube insertion in neonates. Pediatrics. 2014;134:1–8.

Naicker T, Hughes E, McLeod D. Validation of a novel resin-porcine thorax model for chest drain insertion training. Clin Med (Northfield Il). 2012;12(1):49–52.

Bruno CJ, Glass KM. Cost-effective and low-technology options for simulation and training in neonatology. Semin Perinatol. 2016;40(7):473–9.

Ghazali A, Breque C, Leger A, Scepi M, Oriot D. Testing of a complete training model for chest tube insertion in traumatic

pneumothorax. J Soc Simul Healthc. 2015;10:239–44.

Berkenstadt H, Munz Y, Trodler G, Blumenfeld A, Rubin O, Ziv A. Evaluation of the Trauma-Man® simulator for training in chest

drain insertion. Eur J Trauma. 2006;32:523–6.



How to Cite

Hlaing, P. M., Nopparatjamjomras, T. R., & Nopparatjamjomras, S. (2018). PERCEPTION OF MEDICAL DOCTORS ON CHEST TUBE THORACOSTOMY SIMULATION MODEL. Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Science and Health, (3), 33–39. Retrieved from