• Ida Ayu Wirastuti Health Policy and Administration Department, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, G Building 1st Floor Kampus Baru UI Depok 16424, Indonesia
  • Ida Bagus Nyoman Maharjana Health Policy and Administration Department, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, G Building 1st Floor Kampus Baru UI Depok 16424, Indonesia
  • Prastuti Soewondo Health Policy and Administration Department, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, G Building 1st Floor Kampus Baru UI Depok 16424, Indonesia


Third Molar Surgery; Complication; Prevention.


Background: Impacted third molar surgery is one of the most common procedures performed by maxillofacial surgeons and it is often attended by complications. Although clinical conditions associated with retained third molars are well understood, little is known about the impact of those conditions on the quality of life among affected patients. There is growing recognition that the impact of oral conditions on quality of life is an important outcome that can be quite useful in making treatment decisions. All the
information in this review could be useful for the clinicians in order to show the surgical and pharmacologic parameters that may influence the postoperative discomfort in the third molar surgeries.

Methods: This systematic review followed the recommendations in PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Some of the key words or Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms used in in the two data bases (Proquest and Google Scholar) were: (1) Third Molar Surgery, (2) Complication, (3) Prevention. The articles were published in English from 2009 to 2019.

Results: Studies were eligible if they evaluated prevention and management for the complication of third molar surgery, and eight studies for qualitative synthesis. Of the eight articles, all studies were selected with Randomized Control Trial. Eight studies were included because they discussed the prevention and management of third molar surgery complication. Almost all of the practices of prevention and management of third molar surgery complication described that analgetic ibuprofen and paracetamol were
used for decreasing the pain, and also amoxicillin tablet was used as an antibiotic for preventing high risk complication. According to studies, prophylactic use of chlorhexidine mouth rinse in third molar surgery are equally effective in keeping post operative infection to a minimum level in medically competent patient.

Conclusions: All studies revealed that the most common complications of third molar surgery were pain, trismus, swelling, alveolar osteitis, and dry socket. Those studies discussed the prevention and management third molar surgery complication. Ibuprofen and paracetamol were used to decrease the pain, amoxicillin (1g) and amoxicillin/clavulanate (875/125mg) had similar efficacious in preventing infection after retained third molar extraction, but amoxicillin and clavunate (875/125mg) produced more gastrointestinal discomfort. Prophylactic use of chlorhexidine mouth rinse and gel in third molar surgery were equally effective in keeping post operative infection. Corticosteroid had a significant and sustained antiinflammatory effects.


Download data is not yet available.


Barone A, Marconcini S, Giacomelli L, Rispoli L, Calvo JL, Covani U. A randomized clinical evaluation of ultrasound bone surgery versus traditional rotary instruments in lower third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:330-6.

Gude-Sampedro F, GaÌndara Rey JM, GarciÌa-GarciÌa A. Relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain in lower third molar extractions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:979-83.

Atalay Y, Bozkurt MF, Gonul Y, Cakmak O, Agacayak KS, Köse I, et al. The effects of amlodipine and platelet rich plasma on bone healing in rats. Drug Des Devel Ther 2015;9:1973-81.

Bouloux GF, Steed MB, Perciaccante VJ. Complications of third molar surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2007;19:117-28, vii.

F Asutay, Ü Yolcu1, O Geçör1, AH Acar, SA Öztürk, S Malkoç. An Evaluation of Effects Of Platelet-rich-fibrin on Postoperative Morbidities after Lower Third Molar Surgery. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice 2018;1531- 1536

Martin FI et al. Comparative trial between the use of amoxicillin and amoxicillin clavulanate in the removal of third molars. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014 Nov 1;19 (6):e612-5.

Josep Rubio-Palau , Jordi Garcia-Linares , Juan-Antonio Hueto-Madrid , Javier GonzaÌlez-Lagunas , Guillermo Raspall-Martin , Javier Mareque-Buen .Effect of intra-alveolar placement of 0.2% chlorhexidine bioadhesive gel on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the extraction of mandibular third molars. A double-blind randomized clinical trial. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015 Jan 1;20 (1):e117-22.

JoseÌ Marques , Jordi PieÌ-SaÌnchez , Rui Figueiredo , Eduard Valmaseda-CastelloÌn , Cosme Gay-Escoda. Effect of the local administration of betamethasone on pain, swelling and trismus after impacted lower third molar extraction. A randomized, triple blinded, controlled trial. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014 Jan 1;19 (1):e49- 54.

Marta Montserrat-Bosch , Rui Figueiredo , Pedro Nogueira-Magalhães , Josep Arnabat-Dominguez , Eduard,Valmaseda-CastelloÌn, Cosme Gay-Escoda. Efficacy and complications associated with a modified inferior alveolar nerve block technique. A randomized, triple-blind clinical trial. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014 Jul 1;19 (4):e391-7.

Ana Coello-GoÌmez , Selene Navarro-SuaÌrez , JoseÌ-MariÌa Diosdado-Cano , Francisco AzcaÌrate-Velazquez , Patricia Bargiela-PeÌrez , MariÌa-AÌngeles Serrera-Figallo, Daniel Torres-Lagares , Jose-Luis GutieÌrrez-PeÌrez. Postoperative effects on lower third molars of using mouthwashes with super-oxidized solution versus 0.2% chlorhexidine gel: A randomized double-blind trial. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2018 Nov 1;23 (6):e716-22.

H. Ghaeminia et al. Postoperative socket irrigation with drinking tap water reduces the risk of inflammatory complications following surgical removal of third molars: a multicenter randomized trial. Clin Oral Invest (2017) 21:71–83

BenediktsdoÌttir IS, Wenzel A, Petersen JK, Hintze H. Mandibular third molar removal: Risk indicators for extended operation time, postoperative pain, and complications. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;97:438-46.

Moher D, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.

Jerjes W, El-Maaytah M, Swinson B, Banu B, Upile T, D'Sa S, et al. Experience versus complication rate in third molar surgery. Head Face Med 2006;2:14.

Eshghpour M, Dastmalchi P, Nekooei AH, Nejat A. Effect of platelet-rich fibrin on frequency of alveolar osteitis following mandibular third molar surgery: A double-blinded randomized clinical trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;72:1463-7.

Nacopoulos C, Dontas I, Lelovas P, Galanos A, Vesalas AM, Raptou P, et al. Enhancement of bone regeneration with the combination of platelet-rich fibrin and synthetic graft. J Craniofac Surg 2014;25:2164-8.

Poeschl PW, Eckel D, Poeschl E. Postoperative prophylactic antibiotic treatment in third molar surgery--a necessity?. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:3-8.

Costa MG, Pazzini CA, Pantuzo MC, Jorge ML, Marques LS. Is there justification for prophylactic extraction of third molars?. A systematic review. Braz Oral Res. 2013;27:183-8.

Poveda Roda R, BagaÌn JV, Sanchis Bielsa JM, Carbonell Pastor E. Antibiotic use in dental practice. A review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007;12:e186-92.

Siddigi A, Morkel JA, Zafar S. Antibiotic prophylaxis in third molar surgery:a randomized double-blind placebo- controlled clinical trial using split-mouth technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39:107-14.

Zeitler DL. Prophylactic antibiotics for third molar surgery: a dissenting opinion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;53:61-4.

Graziani F, D'Aiuto F, Arduino PG, Tonelli M, Gabriele M. Perioperative dexamethasone reduces post-surgical sequelae of wisdom tooth removal. A split-mouth randomized double-masked clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;35:241-246.

Markiewicz MR, Brady MF, Ding EL, Dodson TB. Corticosteroids reduce postoperative morbidity after third molar surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:1881-1894.

Alexander RE, Throndson RR. A review of perioperative corticosteroid use in dent alveolar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;90:406-415.

Montgomery MT, Hogg JP, Roberts DL, Redding SW. The use of glucocorticosteroids to lessen the inflammatory sequelae following third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;48:179-187.

Esen E, Tasar F, Akhan O. Determination of the anti-inflammatory effects of methylprednisolone on the sequelae of third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;57:1201-6.

Meechan JG, Jaber AA, Corbett IP, Whitworth JM. Buccal versus lingual articaine infiltration for mandibular tooth anaesthesia: A randomized controlled trial. Int Endod J. 2011;44:676-81.

Blanton PL, Jeske AH, ADA Council on Scientific Affairs, ADA Division of Science. Avoiding complications in local anesthesia induction: Anatomical considerations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134:888-93

Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Corbett IP, Meechan JG. Articaine and lidocaine mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: A prospective randomized double-blind cross-over study. J Endod. 2006;32:296-8.

Haas DA. Alternative mandibular nerve block techniques: a review of the Gow-Gates and Akinosi-Vazirani closed-mouth mandibular nerve block techniques. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011;142 Suppl 3:8S-12S.

Ogle OE, Mahjoubi G. Local anesthesia: Agents, techniques, and complications. Dent Clin North Am. 2012;56:133-48.

Poorni S, Veniashok B, Senthilkumar AD, Indira R, Ramachandran S. Anesthetic efficacy of four percent articaine for pulpal anesthesia by using inferior alveolar nerve block and buccal infiltration techniques in patients with irreversible pulpitis: A prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial. J Endod. 2011;37:1603-7.

Leonard MS. Removing third molars. A review for the general practitioner. J Am Dent Assoc. 1992;123:77-86.

Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Meechan JG. A prospective randomized trial of different supplementary local anesthetic techniques after failure of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis in

mandibular teeth. J Endod. 2012;38:421-5.

Malamed SF. Is the mandibular nerve block passeÌ? J Am Dent Assoc. 2011;142Suppl 3:3S-7S.

Laskin DM. Diagnosis and treatment of complications associated with local anaesthesia. Int Dent J. 1984;34:232-7.

Fernandez R, Griffiths R (2012) Water for wound cleansing. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews2:CD003861. doi:10. 1002/14651858.CD003861.pub3

Osunde OD, Adebola RA, Adeoye JB, Bassey GO (2014) Comparative study of the effect of warm saline mouth

rinse on complications after dental extractions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43(5):649 –653.doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2013.09.016

Chakranarayan A, Jeyaraj CP. 2017. Value of Prophylactic/Postoperative Antibiotics and Corticosteroids in Reducing Morbidity Following Surgical Extractions of Impacted Third Molars. International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Health






How to Cite

PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT FOR THE COMPLICATION OF THIRD MOLAR SURGERY : A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. (2019). Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Science and Health, 4, 1150-1161.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 37

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.